Search found 321 matches
- Mon Apr 06, 2026 5:56 am
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: Oscilloscope Vrms, wrong!
- Replies: 23
- Views: 173863
Re: Oscilloscope Vrms, wrong!
It appears that your magnitude frequency response measurement used periodic pink noise (PN Pink) as the stimulus together with wide-band octave analysis in ARTA. This differs from using true white noise excitation with narrow-band FFT analysis in Multi-Instrument. Similar to frequency sweeping ...
- Sun Apr 05, 2026 5:01 am
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: Oscilloscope Vrms, wrong!
- Replies: 23
- Views: 173863
Re: Oscilloscope Vrms, wrong!
To obtain the absolute attenuation rates at different frequencies, the Bode plot function should be used. However, substantial differences can be observed between your measured gains and the simulation results from LTspice, especially around 1 kHz, where the measured value is about 36 dB, while the ...
- Sat Apr 04, 2026 9:01 pm
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: Oscilloscope Vrms, wrong!
- Replies: 23
- Views: 173863
Re: Oscilloscope Vrms, wrong!
The absolute compensation file can be generated automatically using the transfer function measurement function in Multi-Instrument, with the input signal fed into Ch.B and the response fed into Ch.A. The generated compensation file has a *.gpc format (i.e. including absolute Gain and Phase). Similar ...
- Sat Apr 04, 2026 8:29 pm
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: Oscilloscope Vrms, wrong!
- Replies: 23
- Views: 173863
Re: Oscilloscope Vrms, wrong!
Actually, in the above discussion, the compensation factor at the fundamental frequency is assumed to be 0 dB (i.e., no compensation). If the compensation file is constructed manually or generated from the measured frequency response, with absolute gain values, to flatten the true frequency response ...
- Sat Apr 04, 2026 6:39 pm
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: Oscilloscope Vrms, wrong!
- Replies: 23
- Views: 173863
Re: Oscilloscope Vrms, wrong!
Method 1 for THD+N
(1) THD+N in dB
[THDNDB_A(dB)]+[f1RMS_A(EU)]-[f1RMS_B(EU)]
(2) THD+N in %
POW(10,([THDNDB_A(dB)]+[f1RMS_A(EU)]-[f1RMS_B(EU)])/20)*100
or
[THDN_A(%)]*POW(10,([f1RMS_A(EU)]-[f1RMS_B(EU)])/20)
(1) THD+N in dB
[THDNDB_A(dB)]+[f1RMS_A(EU)]-[f1RMS_B(EU)]
(2) THD+N in %
POW(10,([THDNDB_A(dB)]+[f1RMS_A(EU)]-[f1RMS_B(EU)])/20)*100
or
[THDN_A(%)]*POW(10,([f1RMS_A(EU)]-[f1RMS_B(EU)])/20)
- Sat Apr 04, 2026 6:11 pm
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: Oscilloscope Vrms, wrong!
- Replies: 23
- Views: 173863
Re: Oscilloscope Vrms, wrong!
[Spectrum Analyzer Processing]>"Weighting">"Apply to" is for frequency weighting profile selection only. On the other hand, it is possible to specify the compensation factors for individual channels. If the compensation file is mono, it applies to both channels. If it is stereo, it applies to each ...
- Sat Apr 04, 2026 5:43 pm
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: Oscilloscope Vrms, wrong!
- Replies: 23
- Views: 173863
Re: Oscilloscope Vrms, wrong!
For THD (20–20 kHz, without compensation), Method 1 measured a higher value (0.0000099%) than Method 2 (0.0000079%). This is expected, as Method 1 includes a greater number of harmonic orders (2nd-20rd vs 2nd-9th)
For THD (up to the 8th harmonic, without compensation), Method 1 measured a slightly ...
For THD (up to the 8th harmonic, without compensation), Method 1 measured a slightly ...
- Fri Apr 03, 2026 3:40 am
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: Oscilloscope Vrms, wrong!
- Replies: 23
- Views: 173863
Re: Oscilloscope Vrms, wrong!
With the notch filter output fed into Ch. A, the original signal (i.e., the input to the notch filter) fed into Ch. B, Spectrum Analyzer working in the THD measurement mode, and the Y-scale of the Spectrum Analyzer set to dBr, dBV, dBu, dBSPL, or dBFS, you can define a UDDP (User Defined Data Point ...
- Wed Apr 01, 2026 12:21 am
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: Oscilloscope Vrms, wrong!
- Replies: 23
- Views: 173863
Re: Oscilloscope Vrms, wrong!
Spectral leakage occurs when the sampling parameters do not satisfy the requirements for coherent sampling, i.e., [Sampling Rate] / [Signal Frequency] = [FFT Size] / [Number of Cycles]. When this condition is not met, the energy of a frequency component spreads into adjacent FFT bins, resulting in a ...
- Tue Mar 31, 2026 4:33 am
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: Oscilloscope Vrms, wrong!
- Replies: 23
- Views: 173863
Re: Oscilloscope Vrms, wrong!
At the notch output, your RMS multimeter measured 0.96 mVrms, while the screenshot shows that MI measured 0.8531 mVrms (or 1.2432 mVp). The two values are quite close, considering that your RTX6001 was set to a 4.472 V input range, which is too large to accurately measure such a small-amplitude ...